From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs88t-0007W8-5E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:28:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs88r-0002vo-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:28:39 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f173.google.com ([209.85.215.173]:44379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs88r-0002vi-Fl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:28:37 -0500 Received: by eaad13 with SMTP id d13so1833475eaa.4 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:28:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4F279822.2060409@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:28:34 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1327061206-9404-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4F26C86B.4010105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Use rtc_clock uniformly for ARM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/30/2012 06:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > My timer-fu is weak so I'm not going to claim to have actually > reviewed these, but they don't look to be obviously wrong. > Are you hoping for these to go in via the arm-devs tree? Yes... > You'll need to rebase following the QOM series landing. Gah, right. :) Will wait for the next QOM mass change before reposting, then. Thanks! Paolo