From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEx3-0004qC-2c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:44:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEwu-0003m7-9f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:44:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEwu-0003ln-2x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:44:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4F27FF27.3050806@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:48:07 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1327686829-11791-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <4F27EE29.6010606@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a section for the host OS and a W32 maintainer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Stefan Weil , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 31.01.2012 15:40, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 31 January 2012 13:35, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 27.01.2012 18:53, schrieb Stefan Weil: >>> +Hosts: >>> +------ >>> + >>> +LINUX >>> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>> +S: Maintained >>> +F: linux-* >>> +F: linux-headers/ >>> + >>> +POSIX >>> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>> +S: Maintained >>> +F: *posix* >> >> How can these be "Maintained" without a maintainer? > > They're maintained in the sense that if you break it somebody > *will* fix it, probably with a faster turnaround than any > other host system. Certainly 'Odd Fixes' doesn't sound right. I agree, adding a maintainer name (Anthony?) would be better. Kevin