* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method @ 2012-01-30 2:17 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-01-30 17:28 ` Igor Kovalenko ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-01-30 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, Anthony Liguori, Igor V. Kovalenko Cc: Mark McLoughlin, Michael S. Tsirkin Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an interrupt in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the RxOverflow bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method ignores the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 stops receiving packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the card the emulator could recover from this situation. However some implementations only do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow set in the ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control mechanisms would prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled makes the QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network stall observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in some cases the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the network eventually stops working. Reported-by: Hayato Kakuta <kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> Tested-by: Hayato Kakuta <kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> --- diff -urNp qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c --- qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-12 20:55:27.000000000 +0900 +++ qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-18 17:20:12.000000000 +0900 @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static int rtl8139_can_receive(VLANClien } else { avail = MOD2(s->RxBufferSize + s->RxBufPtr - s->RxBufAddr, s->RxBufferSize); - return (avail == 0 || avail >= 1514); + return (avail == 0 || avail >= 1514 || (s->IntrMask & RxOverflow)); } } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-01-30 2:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-01-30 17:28 ` Igor Kovalenko 2012-01-31 1:25 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-01-31 4:12 ` Igor Kovalenko 2012-02-01 22:11 ` Anthony Liguori 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Igor Kovalenko @ 2012-01-30 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao Cc: Mark McLoughlin, Anthony Liguori, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin 2012/1/30 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>: > Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an interrupt > in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the RxOverflow > bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method ignores > the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 stops receiving > packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. > > If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the card the > emulator could recover from this situation. However some implementations only > do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow set in the > ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control mechanisms would > prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. > > Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled makes the > QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. > > This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network stall > observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in some cases > the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the network > eventually stops working. It would be great to see specific example to verify the issue. Otherwise the change looks great. -- Kind regards, Igor V. Kovalenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-01-30 17:28 ` Igor Kovalenko @ 2012-01-31 1:25 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-01-31 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Igor Kovalenko Cc: Mark McLoughlin, Anthony Liguori, 角田 勇人, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin Hi Igor, Thank you for the prompt reply. I really appreciate it. (2012年01月31日 02:28), Igor Kovalenko wrote: > 2012/1/30 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>: >> Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an interrupt >> in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the RxOverflow >> bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method ignores >> the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 stops receiving >> packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. >> >> If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the card the >> emulator could recover from this situation. However some implementations only >> do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow set in the >> ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control mechanisms would >> prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. >> >> Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled makes the >> QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. >> >> This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network stall >> observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in some cases >> the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the network >> eventually stops working. > It would be great to see specific example to verify the issue. Sure. In the gdb debug session included inline below you can see that after a while RxBufPtr-RxBufAddr becomes too small to accommodate a MTU sized packet and, because of the current can_receive logic, rtl8139 will stop receiving packets from other QEMU VLAN clients. > Otherwise the change looks great. Could I have your "Acked-by"? By the way, whose tree should this patch go through? ----- gdb debug session (gdb) p *(RTL8139State *) 0x144143a0 $3 = {phys = "TR\000bS:\000", mult = "\000\000\000\200\000\000\004@", TxStatus = {565346, 565346, 565346, 565346}, TxAddr = {899350528, 899352064, 899353600, 899355136}, RxBuf = 894697472, RxBufferSize = 32768, RxBufPtr = 0, RxBufAddr = 0, IntrStatus = 0, IntrMask = 49279, TxConfig = 2004878976, RxConfig = 63374, RxMissed = 0, CSCR = 832, Cfg9346 = 0 '\0', Config0 = 0 '\0', Config1 = 12 '\f', Config3 = 1 '\001', Config4 = 0 '\0', Config5 = 0 '\0', clock_enabled = 1 '\001', bChipCmdState = 12 '\f', MultiIntr = 0, BasicModeCtrl = 4096, BasicModeStatus = 30765, NWayAdvert = 1505, NWayLPAR = 1505, NWayExpansion = 1, CpCmd = 0, TxThresh = 0 '\0', pci_dev = 0x14414150, vc = 0x14414550, macaddr = "TR\000bS:", rtl8139_mmio_io_addr = 104, currTxDesc = 0, cplus_enabled = 0, currCPlusRxDesc = 0, currCPlusTxDesc = 0, RxRingAddrLO = 0, RxRingAddrHI = 0, eeprom = {contents = {33065, 4332, 33081, 0, 0, 0, 0, 21076, 25088, 14931, 0 <repeats 54 times>}, mode = 1, tick = 0, address = 9 '\t', input = 0, output = 0, eecs = 1 '\001', eesk = 0 '\0', eedi = 0 '\0', eedo = 1 '\001'}, TCTR = 0, TimerInt = 0, TCTR_base = 0, tally_counters = {TxOk = 0, RxOk = 0, TxERR = 0, RxERR = 10, MissPkt = 0, FAE = 0, Tx1Col = 0, TxMCol = 0, RxOkPhy = 1302, RxOkBrd = 2, RxOkMul = 10, TxAbt = 0, TxUndrn = 0}, cplus_txbuffer = 0x0, cplus_txbuffer_len = 0, cplus_txbuffer_offset = 0, timer = 0x0} (gdb) c Continuing. [Thread 0x42c3a940 (LWP 2739) exited] [New Thread 0x42c3a940 (LWP 2791)] Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x0000003a3a4cced2 in select () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) d Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y (gdb) (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x0000003a3a4cced2 in select () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) p *(RTL8139State *) 0x144143a0 $4 = {phys = "TR\000bS:\000", mult = "\000\000\000\200\000\000\004@", TxStatus = {565308, 565346, 565346, 565346}, TxAddr = {899350528, 899352064, 899353600, 899355136}, RxBuf = 894697472, RxBufferSize = 32768, RxBufPtr = 22032, RxBufAddr = 20544, IntrStatus = 0, IntrMask = 49279, TxConfig = 2004878976, RxConfig = 63374, RxMissed = 0, CSCR = 832, Cfg9346 = 0 '\0', Config0 = 0 '\0', Config1 = 12 '\f', Config3 = 1 '\001', Config4 = 0 '\0', Config5 = 0 '\0', clock_enabled = 1 '\001', bChipCmdState = 12 '\f', MultiIntr = 0, BasicModeCtrl = 4096, BasicModeStatus = 30765, NWayAdvert = 1505, NWayLPAR = 1505, NWayExpansion = 1, CpCmd = 0, TxThresh = 0 '\0', pci_dev = 0x14414150, vc = 0x14414550, macaddr = "TR\000bS:", rtl8139_mmio_io_addr = 104, currTxDesc = 1, cplus_enabled = 0, currCPlusRxDesc = 0, currCPlusTxDesc = 0, RxRingAddrLO = 0, RxRingAddrHI = 0, eeprom = {contents = {33065, 4332, 33081, 0, 0, 0, 0, 21076, 25088, 14931, 0 <repeats 54 times>}, mode = 1, tick = 0, address = 9 '\t', input = 0, output = 0, eecs = 1 '\001', eesk = 0 '\0', eedi = 0 '\0', eedo = 1 '\001'}, TCTR = 0, TimerInt = 0, TCTR_base = 0, tally_counters = {TxOk = 0, RxOk = 0, TxERR = 0, RxERR = 10, MissPkt = 0, FAE = 0, Tx1Col = 0, TxMCol = 0, RxOkPhy = 10277, RxOkBrd = 3, RxOkMul = 10, TxAbt = 0, TxUndrn = 0}, cplus_txbuffer = 0x0, cplus_txbuffer_len = 0, cplus_txbuffer_offset = 0, timer = 0x0} ----- Thanks, Fernando ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-01-30 2:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-01-30 17:28 ` Igor Kovalenko @ 2012-01-31 4:12 ` Igor Kovalenko 2012-01-31 4:21 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-02-01 22:11 ` Anthony Liguori 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Igor Kovalenko @ 2012-01-31 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao Cc: Mark McLoughlin, Anthony Liguori, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin 2012/1/30 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>: > Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an interrupt > in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the RxOverflow > bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method ignores > the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 stops receiving > packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. > > If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the card the > emulator could recover from this situation. However some implementations only > do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow set in the > ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control mechanisms would > prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. > > Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled makes the > QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. > > This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network stall > observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in some cases > the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the network > eventually stops working. > > Reported-by: Hayato Kakuta <kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> > Tested-by: Hayato Kakuta <kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> > --- > > diff -urNp qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c > --- qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-12 20:55:27.000000000 +0900 > +++ qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-18 17:20:12.000000000 +0900 > @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static int rtl8139_can_receive(VLANClien > } else { > avail = MOD2(s->RxBufferSize + s->RxBufPtr - s->RxBufAddr, > s->RxBufferSize); > - return (avail == 0 || avail >= 1514); > + return (avail == 0 || avail >= 1514 || (s->IntrMask & RxOverflow)); > } > } > > > Acked-by: Igor Kovalenko <igor.v.kovalenko@gmail.com> -- Kind regards, Igor V. Kovalenko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-01-31 4:12 ` Igor Kovalenko @ 2012-01-31 4:21 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-01-31 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Igor Kovalenko, Anthony Liguori Cc: Mark McLoughlin, 角田 勇人, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin (2012年01月31日 13:12), Igor Kovalenko wrote: > 2012/1/30 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>: >> Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an interrupt >> in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the RxOverflow >> bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method ignores >> the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 stops receiving >> packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. >> >> If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the card the >> emulator could recover from this situation. However some implementations only >> do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow set in the >> ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control mechanisms would >> prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. >> >> Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled makes the >> QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. >> >> This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network stall >> observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in some cases >> the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the network >> eventually stops working. >> >> Reported-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> >> Tested-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> >> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> >> --- >> >> diff -urNp qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c >> --- qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-12 20:55:27.000000000 +0900 >> +++ qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-18 17:20:12.000000000 +0900 >> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static int rtl8139_can_receive(VLANClien >> } else { >> avail = MOD2(s->RxBufferSize + s->RxBufPtr - s->RxBufAddr, >> s->RxBufferSize); >> - return (avail == 0 || avail>= 1514); >> + return (avail == 0 || avail>= 1514 || (s->IntrMask& RxOverflow)); >> } >> } >> >> >> > Acked-by: Igor Kovalenko<igor.v.kovalenko@gmail.com> Thank you for the review and the ack, Igor. Anthony, could you pick up this patch? Regards, Fernando ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-01-30 2:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-01-30 17:28 ` Igor Kovalenko 2012-01-31 4:12 ` Igor Kovalenko @ 2012-02-01 22:11 ` Anthony Liguori 2012-02-03 2:16 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Anthony Liguori @ 2012-02-01 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao Cc: Mark McLoughlin, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin On 01/29/2012 08:17 PM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: > Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an interrupt > in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the RxOverflow > bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method ignores > the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 stops receiving > packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. > > If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the card the > emulator could recover from this situation. However some implementations only > do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow set in the > ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control mechanisms would > prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. > > Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled makes the > QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. > > This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network stall > observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in some cases > the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the network > eventually stops working. > > Reported-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> > Tested-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori > --- > > diff -urNp qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c > --- qemu-kvm-orig/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-12 20:55:27.000000000 +0900 > +++ qemu-kvm/hw/rtl8139.c 2012-01-18 17:20:12.000000000 +0900 > @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static int rtl8139_can_receive(VLANClien > } else { > avail = MOD2(s->RxBufferSize + s->RxBufPtr - s->RxBufAddr, > s->RxBufferSize); > - return (avail == 0 || avail>= 1514); > + return (avail == 0 || avail>= 1514 || (s->IntrMask& RxOverflow)); > } > } > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-02-01 22:11 ` Anthony Liguori @ 2012-02-03 2:16 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-02-14 7:33 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-02-03 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Mark McLoughlin, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin On 02/02/2012 07:11 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/29/2012 08:17 PM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: >> Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting an >> interrupt >> in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the >> RxOverflow >> bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive method >> ignores >> the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 >> stops receiving >> packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. >> >> If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the >> card the >> emulator could recover from this situation. However some >> implementations only >> do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow >> set in the >> ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control >> mechanisms would >> prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. >> >> Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled >> makes the >> QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. >> >> This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) network >> stall >> observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in >> some cases >> the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the >> network >> eventually stops working. >> >> Reported-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> >> Tested-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> >> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> > > Applied. Thanks. Hi Anthony, It seems that this patch did not make it into the git tree. Did you find any merge conflicts? Thanks, Fernando ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method 2012-02-03 2:16 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-02-14 7:33 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao @ 2012-02-14 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Liguori; +Cc: Mark McLoughlin, qemu-devel, Michael S. Tsirkin On 02/03/2012 11:16 AM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: > On 02/02/2012 07:11 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 01/29/2012 08:17 PM, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote: >>> Some drivers (Linux' 8139too among them) rely on the NIC injecting >>> an interrupt >>> in the event of a receive buffer overflow and, accordingly, set the >>> RxOverflow >>> bit in the interrupt mask. Unfortunately rtl8139's can_receive >>> method ignores >>> the RxOverflow flag, which may lead to a situation where rtl8139 >>> stops receiving >>> packets (can_receive returns 0) when the receive buffer becomes full. >>> >>> If the driver eventually read from the receive buffer or reset the >>> card the >>> emulator could recover from this situation. However some >>> implementations only >>> do this upon receiving an interrupt with either RxOK or RxOverflow >>> set in the >>> ISR; interrupt that will never come because QEMU's flow control >>> mechanisms would >>> prevent rtl8139 from receiving any packet. >>> >>> Letting packets go through when the overflow interrupt is enabled >>> makes the >>> QEMU emulator compliant to the spec and solves the problem. >>> >>> This patch should fix a relatively common (in our experience) >>> network stall >>> observed when running enterprise distros with rtl8139 as the NIC; in >>> some cases >>> the 8139too device driver gets loaded and when under heavy load the >>> network >>> eventually stops working. >>> >>> Reported-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> >>> Tested-by: Hayato Kakuta<kakuta.hayato@oss.ntt.co.jp> >>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao<fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp> >> >> Applied. Thanks. > > Hi Anthony, > > It seems that this patch did not make it into the git tree. > Did you find any merge conflicts? ping ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-14 7:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-01-30 2:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: honor RxOverflow flag in can_receive method Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-01-30 17:28 ` Igor Kovalenko 2012-01-31 1:25 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-01-31 4:12 ` Igor Kovalenko 2012-01-31 4:21 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-02-01 22:11 ` Anthony Liguori 2012-02-03 2:16 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao 2012-02-14 7:33 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).