From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RulT5-000171-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:52:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RulT0-00028i-19 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:52:23 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:35522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RulSz-00028a-N2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:52:17 -0500 Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so7615779dad.4 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:52:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4F312C8A.9080700@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:52:10 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ehu7pxvf.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F312AFC.6020908@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4F312AFC.6020908@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 7 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Developers qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list , quintela@redhat.com On 02/07/2012 02:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Another topic that can be answered by email is what the time planning > for the 4th QOM series looks like. Are there things that developers of > new devices should keep in mind / start doing differently wrt SysBus? Another related question is, should the 4th QOM series present a full composition tree based on the legacy qdev bus concept? Currently it doesn't, but if not, why not? That would help _a lot_ with removing PROP_PTR. Paolo