From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com, areis@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
blauwirbel@gmail.com, michael@walle.cc,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: memory.txt document the endian field
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:19:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F37D896.1030203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120212150658.GC27718@redhat.com>
On 02/12/2012 05:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > It's really really simple:
> >
> > If the device spec says "big endian, specify DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN, and
> > treat the data naturally in the callback.
> > If the device spec says "little endian, specify DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> > and treat the data naturally in the callback.
> >
> > That's it.
>
> OKay, but I'm sure your API does not go read the spec, so
> we should not base the description on that :)
> Right?
>
> So I think the following is right?
>
>
> commit 02aa79aac9bec1c8c17d1b7b5405b59b649dfdb9
> Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Feb 8 17:16:35 2012 +0200
>
> docs: memory.txt document the endian field
>
> This is an attempt to document the endian
> field in memory API. As this is a confusing topic,
> add some examples.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/docs/memory.txt b/docs/memory.txt
> index 5bbee8e..9132c86 100644
> --- a/docs/memory.txt
> +++ b/docs/memory.txt
> @@ -170,3 +170,48 @@ various constraints can be supplied to control how these callbacks are called:
> - .old_portio and .old_mmio can be used to ease porting from code using
> cpu_register_io_memory() and register_ioport(). They should not be used
> in new code.
> +- .endianness; specifies the device endian-ness, which affects
> + the handling of the value parameter passed from guest to write
> + and returned to guest from read callbacks, as follows:
> + void write(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
> + uint64_t value, unsigned size)
> + uint64_t read(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
> + unsigned size)
> + value is always passed in the natural host format,
> + low size bytes in value are set, the rest are zero padded
> + on input and ignored on output.
> + Legal values for endian-ness are:
> + DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN - The value is left in the format used by guest.
> + Note that although this is typically a fixed format as
> + guest drivers take care of endian conversions,
> + if host endian-ness does not match the device this will
> + result in "mixed endian" since the data is always
> + stored in low bits of value.
> +
> + To handle this data, on write, you typically need to first
> + convert to the appropriate type, removing the
> + padding. On read, handle the data in the appropriate
> + type and then convert to uint64_t, padding with leading zeroes.
No. Data is converted from guest endian to host endian on write (vice
versa on read). This works if the device endianness matches the guest
endianness.
> +
> + DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN - The value is assumed to be
> + endian, and is converted to host endian.
> + DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN - The value is assumed to be
> + big endian, and is converted to host endian.
Yes.
> +
> + As an example, consider a little endian guest writing a 32 bit
> + value 0x12345678 into an MMIO register, on a big endian host.
> + The value passed to the write callback is documented below:
> +
> + DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN - value = 0x0000000087654321
> + Explanation: write callback will get the high bits
> + in value set to 0, and low bits set to data left
> + as is, that is in little endian format.
No, you'll see 0x12345678, same as DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN.
> + DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN - value = 0x0000000012345678
> + Explanation: the write callback will get the high bits
> + in value set to 0, and low bits set to data in big endian
> + format.
> + DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN - value = 0x0000000087654321
> + Explanation: the write callback will get the high bits
> + in value set to 0, and low bits set to data in little endian
> + format.
> +
Right value, wrong explanation. The value is still in big endian format.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-12 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-12 12:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: memory.txt document the endian field Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-02-12 13:02 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-12 13:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-02-12 13:55 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-12 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-02-12 15:19 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-02-12 18:20 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-12 18:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F37D896.1030203@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=areis@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).