From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx5Ws-0000ud-BO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:41:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx5Wq-00030p-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:41:54 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:56883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx5Wq-00030b-QD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:41:52 -0500 Received: by qcsc20 with SMTP id c20so3446978qcs.4 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:41:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <4F399FBD.4050302@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:41:49 -0800 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] AREG0 patches v5 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel , Aurelien Jarno On 02/13/2012 12:13 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > Blue Swirl (6): > TCG: split i386 and x86_64 > TCG: clean up i386 and x86_64 I object to these. I do NOT think splitting these makes the code base as a whole any cleaner. Is this really just about the differences wrt the softmmu templates? Surely that can be handled without duping the entire host port... r~