From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49881)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1RxLkt-0005fK-U1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:01:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1RxLkl-0003Xq-It
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:01:27 -0500
Received: from mail-qw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:59454)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1RxLkl-0003Xe-Ex
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:01:19 -0500
Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so380255qaf.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F3A935B.7080401@twiddle.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:01:15 -0800
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAu8pHt77bce+ONpdFvcZCiVf0mrT9Twy=NogqHLrU4xnoCvaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F399FBD.4050302@twiddle.net> <4F3A47B6.7040609@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F3A47B6.7040609@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] AREG0 patches v5
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 02/14/2012 03:38 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 14.02.2012 00:41, schrieb Richard Henderson:
>> On 02/13/2012 12:13 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> Blue Swirl (6):
>>>   TCG: split i386 and x86_64
>>>   TCG: clean up i386 and x86_64
>>
>> I object to these.  I do NOT think splitting these makes the code base
>> as a whole any cleaner.
>>
>> Is this really just about the differences wrt the softmmu templates?
>> Surely that can be handled without duping the entire host port...
> 
> FWIW ppc and ppc64 use different directories, too.

I know.  I've offered to clean those up for malc too, but he declined.


r~