From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58286)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RzJF0-0005ei-4c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:44:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RzJEy-00059q-6r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:44:38 -0500
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:47923)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RzJEy-00059m-2U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:44:36 -0500
Received: by obbup16 with SMTP id up16so7530272obb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F41B390.9040000@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:44:32 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1329695104-15174-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>	<1329695104-15174-7-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>	<CAA=zYJYD-YEMN5UbTpmErmV7KkFyD36WPdd_jRrF719ugFOGHA@mail.gmail.com>	<4F419D7F.7030806@codemonkey.ws>
	<4F41AEEB.3000304@comstyle.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F41AEEB.3000304@comstyle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] gtk: make default UI
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
Cc: Roy Tam <roytam@gmail.com>, Alex Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 02/19/2012 08:24 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 19/02/12 8:10 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> If not, it will be nice to keep
>>> SDL because GTK huge and not that portable for win32 users.
>>
>> Neither are true. GTK is a reasonably small dependency especially given
>> that GLIB is a mandatory dependency. I can't imagine that in terms of
>> binary size, libsdl is much bigger than gtk/gdk.
>
> Double check your facts. That's not even close to being true.
>
> SDL is a tiny fraction of Gtk+.
>
> Just as an example taking a look at package sizes..
>
> 549KB for SDL vs 17.3MB for just Gtk+ and its dependencies (7 libraries)
> excluding Glib2 and what it depends on.

I don't see how 17.3MB qualifies as "huge".

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  Glib2 and dependencies are 14.5MB
> (5 libraries). The two in total drag in 12 libraries at 31MBs. That's IMO
> a fair bit larger than QEMU itself at 25.9MB.
>