From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33393)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1RzRUp-00087B-Kh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:33:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1RzRUo-0006wF-3q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:33:31 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50461)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1RzRUn-0006wB-Rx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:33:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4F422F83.8000807@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:33:23 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4F3D3F67.9050506@mentor.com> <4F3E2945.3000603@redhat.com>
	<4F40ECC6.8000603@mentor.com> <4F420E3D.40307@redhat.com>
	<4F422AF3.2070807@mentor.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F422AF3.2070807@mentor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add object_property_get_child().
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Barabash <alexander_barabash@mentor.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 02/20/2012 12:13 PM, Alexander Barabash wrote:
> I would only suggest that the documentation of object_property_add_child()
> be amended to reflect the fact that the child object may be retrieved using
> object_property_get_link().

Sure, feel free to post a patch for that or to add a synonym with
#define.  Alternatively, amending the documentation of
object_property_get_link or even renaming it would also be fine, I guess.

Paolo