From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0p5H-0001Wr-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:56:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0p5A-0008OO-8F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:56:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:64719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0p5A-0008OH-3l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:56:44 -0500 Received: by eeit10 with SMTP id t10so332710eei.4 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:56:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4F4734A8.3090707@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:56:40 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F41F91F.7060206@redhat.com> <4F44CF3B.9010208@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: "aliguori@us.ibm.com" , Marcelo Tosatti , Jan Kiszka , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" On 02/24/2012 01:55 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Hi paolo The DM and 24/12 test case assumes the changing of DM bit > will reflect to RTC internal clock. But the datasheet said nothing > will affect if you change it. Also, the current logic in qemu has the > same assumption. Does this a bug or just by design? Don't care about that part, it was more to test the BCD logic. Paolo