From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46789)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1S0wy9-0001ov-Iv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:22:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1S0wy8-0002bj-5H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:22:01 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46660 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1S0wy7-0002bf-VV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:22:00 -0500
Message-ID: <4F47AB14.4010407@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:21:56 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1330092792-22455-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<1330092792-22455-5-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<4F479D6F.3000302@suse.de> <20120224125623.205fdd16@doriath.home>
In-Reply-To: <20120224125623.205fdd16@doriath.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] boards: switch machine type list to
 QTAILQ
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 24.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100
> Andreas F=E4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>=20
>> Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
>>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
>>
>> Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head th=
is
>> is already just object_class_foreach() / object_class_by_name(), simil=
ar
>> to CPUs on my qom-cpu branch.
>=20
> Is there a plan to convert this to qom anytime soon?

I was planning to look into it after CPU is done, if no one beats me.
Since CPU will touch on the machine init functions, doing both in
parallel did not seem like a good idea to me.

I consider both CPU and machine 1.1 material - if we can agree on the
way there, then the code you are changing here will not see a release.
It certainly doesn't hurt to commit it though. :)

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg