From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] converting the block layer from coroutines to threads
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:43:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F47F685.5010000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F47E37A.6000702@codemonkey.ws>
On 02/24/2012 08:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Virtio really wants each virtqueue to be processed in a separate
> thread. On a multicore system, there's considerable improvement doing
> this. I think that's where we ought to start.
Well, that's where we ought to *get*. Stefan's work is awesome but with
the current feature set it would be hard to justify it upstream.
To get it upstream we need to generalize it and make it work well with
the block layer. And vice versa make the block layer work well with
threads, which is what I care about here.
> We really just need the block layer to be re-entrant, we don't
> actually need qcow2 or anything else that uses coroutines to use full
> threads.
Once you can issue I/O from two threads at the same-time (such as
streaming in the iothread and guest I/O in the virtqueue thread),
everything already needs to be thread-safe. It is a pretty short step
from there to thread pools for everything.
> Or at least, as far as I know, we don't have any performance data to
> suggest that we do.
No, it's not about speed, though of course it only works if there is no
performance dip. It is just an enabling step.
That said, my weekend officially begins now. :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 19:02 [Qemu-devel] converting the block layer from coroutines to threads Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-24 19:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-24 20:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-02-24 21:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-28 9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F47F685.5010000@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).