From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1OvG-0000lx-Bu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:13:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1Ov8-00028Q-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:12:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:35604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1Ov8-00028K-JX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:12:46 -0500 Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so4737780pbb.4 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:12:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F494EC7.6070905@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:12:39 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1330198969-27364-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1330198969-27364-3-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] qtest: add support for -M pc List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/25/2012 02:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 02/25/2012 08:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> This involves replacing the local APIC with the qtest interrupt controller. >> >> It should be pretty straight forward to do the same for other machine types. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori >> --- >> hw/pc_piix.c | 3 +++ >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c >> index 5e11d15..2c0881e 100644 >> --- a/hw/pc_piix.c >> +++ b/hw/pc_piix.c >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ >> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN >> # include >> #endif >> +#include "qtest.h" >> >> #define MAX_IDE_BUS 2 >> >> @@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory, >> i8259 = kvm_i8259_init(isa_bus); >> } else if (xen_enabled()) { >> i8259 = xen_interrupt_controller_init(); >> + } else if (qtest_enabled()) { >> + i8259 = qtest_interrupt_controller_init(); >> } else { >> cpu_irq = pc_allocate_cpu_irq(); >> i8259 = i8259_init(isa_bus, cpu_irq[0]); > > This is not needed anymore. Why? This is necessary for IRQ to work. You mean, if you use irq_intercept, this isn't needed? Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Paolo > >