From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S28lJ-00057j-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S28lE-00056S-5h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S28lD-00056A-TO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BFF1A.8040703@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:09:30 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87r4xg1n5g.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F4BBBA8.3020105@redhat.com> <4F4BFC9A.1020300@redhat.com> <4F4BFE4D.8000409@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4F4BFE4D.8000409@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 28th List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Eric Blake , quintela@trasno.org, KVM devel mailing list , Developers qemu-devel Il 27/02/2012 23:06, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > > Thanks! One thing I'm having trouble following on your proposal: What > commands are valid within > blockdev-start-transaction/blockdev-commit-transaction? > > If I do: > > blockdev-start-transaction > stop > drive-reopen > drive-mirror > blockdev-end-transaction > > What state should I expect that my guest is in (paused or running)? Paused. Only the two new commands and blockdev-snapshot-sync are part of the transaction (edited the wiki now). What I like most in Jeff's new command is that it's not even a question. On the other hand we have to be sure that we can extend it, and perhaps change its name already in 1.1... Paolo