* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions
@ 2012-02-27 16:27 Kevin Wolf
2012-02-28 9:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2012-02-27 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf
Image files that make qemu-img info read several gigabytes into the
unknown header extensions list are bad. Just fail opening the image
if an extension claims to be large.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block/qcow2.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
index f68f0e1..077fe05 100644
--- a/block/qcow2.c
+++ b/block/qcow2.c
@@ -108,6 +108,11 @@ static int qcow2_read_extensions(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t start_offset,
#ifdef DEBUG_EXT
printf("ext.magic = 0x%x\n", ext.magic);
#endif
+ if (ext.len > 65536) {
+ error_report("Header extension larger than 64k - this looks wrong");
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
+
switch (ext.magic) {
case QCOW2_EXT_MAGIC_END:
return 0;
--
1.7.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions
2012-02-27 16:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions Kevin Wolf
@ 2012-02-28 9:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-28 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2012-02-28 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Wolf; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> + if (ext.len > 65536) {
> + error_report("Header extension larger than 64k - this looks wrong");
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> + }
This is an implementation limit and not in the spec, but I think it's
reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions
2012-02-28 9:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2012-02-28 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-02-28 10:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2012-02-28 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi; +Cc: qemu-devel
Am 28.02.2012 10:33, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>> + if (ext.len > 65536) {
>> + error_report("Header extension larger than 64k - this looks wrong");
>> + return -ENOTSUP;
>> + }
>
> This is an implementation limit and not in the spec, but I think it's
> reasonable.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hm, actually, now that I look at this patch again, I think there's a
much better error condition that even matches the spec:
if (offset + ext.len > end_offset)
I'll send a changed version of the patch.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions
2012-02-28 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
@ 2012-02-28 10:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-28 10:18 ` Kevin Wolf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2012-02-28 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Wolf; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 10:33, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> + if (ext.len > 65536) {
>>> + error_report("Header extension larger than 64k - this looks wrong");
>>> + return -ENOTSUP;
>>> + }
>>
>> This is an implementation limit and not in the spec, but I think it's
>> reasonable.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Hm, actually, now that I look at this patch again, I think there's a
> much better error condition that even matches the spec:
>
> if (offset + ext.len > end_offset)
Careful, integer overflow.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions
2012-02-28 10:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2012-02-28 10:18 ` Kevin Wolf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2012-02-28 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Hajnoczi; +Cc: qemu-devel
Am 28.02.2012 11:00, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Am 28.02.2012 10:33, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> + if (ext.len > 65536) {
>>>> + error_report("Header extension larger than 64k - this looks wrong");
>>>> + return -ENOTSUP;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> This is an implementation limit and not in the spec, but I think it's
>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Hm, actually, now that I look at this patch again, I think there's a
>> much better error condition that even matches the spec:
>>
>> if (offset + ext.len > end_offset)
>
> Careful, integer overflow.
offset/end_offset are uint64_t offsets into the first cluster, ext.len
is uint32_t. Looks safe.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-28 10:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-27 16:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Reject unrealistically large header extensions Kevin Wolf
2012-02-28 9:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-28 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-02-28 10:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-02-28 10:18 ` Kevin Wolf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).