From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36369)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1S2mEg-0002ev-Fr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:18:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1S2mEZ-00005Q-85
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:18:38 -0500
Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:63827)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1S2mEZ-000056-1q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:18:31 -0500
Received: by dajr28 with SMTP id r28so695136daj.33
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F4E4FCF.1010601@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:18:23 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20120229161630.GB8661@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120229161630.GB8661@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] port io mem leak
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 02/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Valgrind shows a memory leak below:

Is this with Avi's latest branch or is this in qemu.git?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> ==21745== 208 (112 direct, 96 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely
> lost in loss record 588 of 856
> ==21745==    at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> ==21745==    by 0x24D4C5: malloc_and_trace (vl.c:2156)
> ==21745==    by 0x50637D2: g_malloc (in /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.5)
> ==21745==    by 0x21A519: isa_register_portio_list (isa-bus.c:102)
> ==21745==    by 0x210DF7: ide_init_ioport (core.c:1993)
> ==21745==    by 0x2169EF: pci_piix_ide_initfn (piix.c:137)
> ==21745==    by 0x2269DD: pci_qdev_init (pci.c:1492)
> ==21745==    by 0x274839: qdev_init (qdev.c:150)
> ==21745==    by 0x27491C: qdev_init_nofail (qdev.c:243)
> ==21745==    by 0x225DD7: pci_create_simple_multifunction (pci.c:1552)
> ==21745==    by 0x216C7E: pci_piix3_ide_init (piix.c:224)
> ==21745==    by 0x3380A6: pc_init1 (pc_piix.c:257)
>