qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] restart a coroutine?
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:08:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F53938D.3050004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F536316.5050503@msgid.tls.msk.ru>

On 03/04/2012 02:41 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Since all block (bdrv) layer is now implemented using
> coroutines, I thought I'd give it a try.  But immediately
> hit a question to which I don't know a good answer.
>
> Suppose we've some networking block device (like NBD) and
> want to be able to support reconnection - this is actually
> very useful feature, in order to be able to reboot/restart
> the NBD server without a need to restart all the clients.
>
> For this to work, we should have an ability to reconnect
> to the server and re-issue all requests which were waiting
> for reply.
>
> Traditionally, in asyncronous event-loop-based scheme, this
> is implemented as a queue of requests linked to the block
> driver state structure, and in case of reconnection we just
> walk over all requests and requeue these.
>
> But if the block driver is implemented as a set of coroutines
> (like nbd currently does), I see no sane/safe way to restart
> the requests.  Setjmp/longjmp can be uses with extra care
> there, but with these it is extremly fragile.
>
> Any hints on how to do that?
>

>From the block layer's point of view, the requests should still be
pending.  For example, if a read request sees a dropped connection, it
adds itself to a list of coroutines waiting for a reconnect, wakes up a
connection manager coroutine (or thread), and sleeps.  The connection
manager periodically tries to connect, and if it succeeds, it wakes up
the coroutines waiting for a reconnection.

It's important to implement request cancellation correctly here, or we
can end up with a device that cannot be unplugged or a guest that cannot
be shutdown.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-04 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-04 12:41 [Qemu-devel] restart a coroutine? Michael Tokarev
2012-03-04 16:08 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-03-04 20:01   ` Michael Tokarev
2012-03-05  8:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-03-05  9:20     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F53938D.3050004@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).