From: Alexey Korolev <alexey.korolev@endace.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: sfd@endace.com, seabios@seabios.org, mst@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 4/6] Mapping of BARs and Bridge regions
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:31:06 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F544F9A.8040103@endace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F5074FC.3080500@redhat.com>
On 02/03/12 20:21, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 03/01/12 23:01, Alexey Korolev wrote:
>> On 01/03/12 22:22, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> On 03/01/12 07:57, Alexey Korolev wrote:
>>>> In pci_bios_map_regions() we try to reserve memory for
>>>> all entries of root bus regions.
>>>> If pci_bios_init_root_regions() fails - e.g no enough space, we create two new pci_regions:
>>>> r64pref, r64mem and migrate all entries which are 64bit capable to them. Migration process
>>>> is very simple: delete the entry from one list add to another.
>>> It isn't that simple. There are a bunch of constrains. First the
>>> bridge must be 64bit capable. All bridges up to the root bus in case of
>>> nested bridges. Second all other prefmem bars of devices behind the
>>> bridge must be 64bit capable too. Again, in case of nested bridges this
>>> applies to all devices behind the toplevel bridge.
>> It must be simple as we derive 64bit flag from devices behind the bridge at the stage of building topology.
>>
>> In other words if the entry at the stage of mapping has 64bit flag it means that the entry and all
>> the entries behind it are 64bit capable.
>>
>> + for (i = (MaxPCIBus + 1) * PCI_REGION_TYPE_COUNT ; i < 0; i--) {
>> + .................
>> + is64bit = this_entry->is64bit;
>> + size = 0;
>> + foreach_region_entry(®ions[i-1], entry) {
>> + size += entry->size;
>> + is64bit &= entry->is64bit;
>> + }
>> .................
>> + this_entry->is64bit = is64bit;
> This pass looks at the children and clears the is64bit in the parent in
> case one of the children isn't 64bit capable.
>
> I think you need a second pass here, clearing the is64bit in all
> children in case the parent has is64bit cleared.
It is unnecessary since the parent is not 64bit capable - both the parent and its children would never be mapped to 64bit range.
One thing is missing in my code is reading bridge capabilities - so I've added it.
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-05 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 5:50 [Qemu-devel] [Seabios] [PATCH 0/6] 64bit PCI BARs allocations (take 2) Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 6:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [Seabios] [PATCH 1/6] Adding new structures Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 6:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] New service functions and ported old functions to 64bit Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 6:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] Fill PCI regions with etnries Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 6:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] Mapping of BARs and Bridge regions Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 9:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] " Gerd Hoffmann
2012-03-01 22:01 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-03-02 7:21 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-03-05 5:31 ` Alexey Korolev [this message]
2012-03-01 7:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] Delete old code Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 7:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] 64bit PCI range in _CRS table Alexey Korolev
2012-03-01 9:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [Seabios] [PATCH 0/6] 64bit PCI BARs allocations (take 2) Gerd Hoffmann
2012-03-01 21:48 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-03-02 7:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-03-05 5:34 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-03-05 10:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-03-06 4:28 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-03-04 19:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin O'Connor
2012-03-05 6:03 ` Alexey Korolev
2012-03-05 13:16 ` Kevin O'Connor
2012-03-05 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] " Gerd Hoffmann
2012-03-05 13:49 ` Kevin O'Connor
2012-03-06 4:44 ` Alexey Korolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F544F9A.8040103@endace.com \
--to=alexey.korolev@endace.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=seabios@seabios.org \
--cc=sfd@endace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).