From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Uud-0001h5-Ai for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:13:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4UuX-0000tu-8F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:13:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4UuW-0000tk-Vq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:12:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4F549176.6070404@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:12:06 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1330581043.29508.61.camel@nzhmlwks0057.ad.endace.com> <4F4F3BF2.7040003@redhat.com> <4F4FEECB.3060901@endace.com> <4F5071DA.5020101@redhat.com> <4F545052.1060406@endace.com> In-Reply-To: <4F545052.1060406@endace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [Seabios] [PATCH 0/6] 64bit PCI BARs allocations (take 2) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Korolev Cc: sfd@endace.com, avi@redhat.com, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com Hi, > I can either send a patch over existing patches, or send new series or both. For testing a incremental patch is fine, for merge a new series with the fixes squashed into the buggy patches is needed. cheers, Gerd