From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40622)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mprivozn@redhat.com>) id 1S4Xcp-0008NL-D4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:07:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mprivozn@redhat.com>) id 1S4XcR-0005s5-1I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:06:50 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1735)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mprivozn@redhat.com>) id 1S4XcQ-0005rs-PA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:06:26 -0500
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25D6ODh029775
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:06:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4F54BA4F.90701@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:06:23 +0100
From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1330703384-17447-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1330703384-17447-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] libcacard: Fix compilation with gcc-4.7
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 02.03.2012 16:49, Hans de Goede wrote:
> VCARD_ATR_PREFIX is used as part of an array initializer so it should
> not have () around it, so far this happened to work, but gcc-4.7 does
> not like it.

Neither do gcc-4.6.2.