From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
i.mitsyanko@samsung.com,
"KVM devel mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
quintela@redhat.com,
"Developers qemu-devel" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dmitry Solodkiy" <d.solodkiy@samsung.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:17:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F54D914.2010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F54D87E.1090109@codemonkey.ws>
On 03/05/2012 05:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> The other alternative is to s/target_phys_addr_t/uint64_t/ in the memory
>> API. I think 32-on-32 is quite rare these days, so it wouldn't be much
>> of a performance issue.
>
>
> I think this makes sense independent of other discussions regarding
> fixing target_phys_addr_t size.
>
> Hardware addresses should be independent of the target. If we wanted
> to use a hw_addr_t that would be okay too.
>
Would this hw_addr (s/_t$//, or you'll be Blued) be fixed at uint64_t
(and thus only documentary), or also subject to multiple compilation?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-05 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 18:55 [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31 Juan Quintela
2012-01-30 23:41 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 23:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 0:37 ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-31 10:49 ` Lluís Vilanova
2012-01-31 13:15 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-31 14:01 ` Mitsyanko Igor
2012-08-08 16:25 ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-09 7:53 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-01-31 14:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 15:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-31 15:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-31 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-09 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-09 22:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-09 22:42 ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-09 23:17 ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-09 23:21 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-21 15:33 ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-22 8:06 ` Mitsyanko Igor
2012-03-05 13:38 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-05 14:13 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 14:37 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-05 15:10 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-05 15:17 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-03-05 18:53 ` Blue Swirl
2012-03-05 20:58 ` malc
2012-03-05 15:20 ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:21 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:27 ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:43 ` Andreas Färber
2012-03-05 15:47 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:50 ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 17:27 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-12 9:43 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-14 9:30 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-14 10:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 13:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 14:09 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 14:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 14:44 ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 16:23 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F54D914.2010203@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=d.solodkiy@samsung.com \
--cc=i.mitsyanko@samsung.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).