From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Zj8-0007tZ-Nq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:21:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Ziy-0001jT-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:21:30 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4Ziy-0001jF-Ms for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:21:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4F54D9EB.9030906@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:21:15 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ehuhrpel.fsf@elfo.elfo> <4F272A92.2010609@suse.de> <4F272D8C.8020608@codemonkey.ws> <4F27E98E.2080501@suse.de> <4F54C1C0.6030803@samsung.com> <4F54CA04.4070804@redhat.com> <4F54CFA3.6080400@samsung.com> <4F54D769.5050000@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: i.mitsyanko@samsung.com, KVM devel mailing list , quintela@redhat.com, Developers qemu-devel , Dmitry Solodkiy , Anthony Liguori , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= On 03/05/2012 05:20 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 5 March 2012 15:10, Avi Kivity wrote: > > I think 32-on-32 is quite rare these days, so it wouldn't be much > > of a performance issue. > > 32-on-32 will be the standard case for KVM on ARM I think... Won't we be virtualizing LPAE per default? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function