From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4vrx-0000QO-R0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:00:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4vrr-0003Rb-Mw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:00:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4vrr-0003RT-F7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:59:59 -0500 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q26Exvq9030386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:59:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4F562669.7060703@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:59:53 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1331036527-7651-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1331036527-7651-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20120306145529.GF12096@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120306145529.GF12096@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-balloon: note optional features List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, uobergfe@redhat.com, owasserm@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com Il 06/03/2012 15:55, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > It is not a problem if the destination does not have > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST. In that case, the guest > > will simply do useless virtqueue traffic, but the destination > > does not have a problem. > > (In fact, it _is_ a problem if the destination has > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST but the source does not. > > The feature bit should have been backwards! Luckily, > > our implementation is free from this problem). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > > Can't we just add a flag to control this feature? I think the sane thing here would be to remove it from the spec. Paolo