From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49537) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4w4l-0005aA-1i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:13:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4w4e-0006gs-S1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:13:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S4w4e-0006gm-Km for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:13:12 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q26FDBQi027717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:13:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4F562983.4000405@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:13:07 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1331036527-7651-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1331036527-7651-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20120306145529.GF12096@redhat.com> <4F562669.7060703@redhat.com> <20120306150850.GG12096@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120306150850.GG12096@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-balloon: note optional features List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, uobergfe@redhat.com, owasserm@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com Il 06/03/2012 16:08, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > > Can't we just add a flag to control this feature? > > > > I think the sane thing here would be to remove it from the spec. > > I guess we could but what does it buy us? Not having a broken spec. :) The pedantically correct thing to do would be to replace it with VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DONT_TELL_HOST (so that it breaks in the 1->0 direction rather than 0->1). But indeed it doesn't buy enough, so it's not worth the effort of updating guests+QEMU+spec. Paolo