From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5g9x-0004k3-OA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:25:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5g9d-000309-A0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:25:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:57943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5g9d-0002zi-3q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:25:25 -0500 Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so696118dad.4 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:25:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F58DD6F.8080907@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:25:19 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1330176948-14379-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <4F58D961.70706@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F58D961.70706@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vnc: Fix packed boolean struct members List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: QEMU Trivial , Stefan Hajnoczi , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil On 03/08/2012 10:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 08/03/2012 16:26, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto: >> I had to drop this patch from the trivial patches tree, it tickles a >> new gcc warning. Please resend with the necessary change. >> >> I cannot reproduce it on my build host here with gcc Debian 4.6.2-12 >> but Anthony reports the following Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4: >> >> CC ui/vnc-auth-sasl.o >> cc1: warnings being treated as errors >> /home/anthony/git/qemu/ui/vnc-auth-sasl.c: In function >> ‘vnc_sasl_client_cleanup’: >> /home/anthony/git/qemu/ui/vnc-auth-sasl.c:34:9: error: suggest >> parentheses around assignment used as truth value >> make: *** [ui/vnc-auth-sasl.o] Error 1 > > Looks like a GCC bug where > > x = y = 0; > > is converted to > > x = (y = 0) != 0; Curious, why convert like this? What does this optimization do? Regards, Anthony Liguori > > and the magic that does this inside the compiler causes the warning. > > We should add a configure check to only add -Werror on compilers newer > than X (for example X could leave out GCC 4.5), so that this patch can > be reapplied. > > Paolo >