From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gFF-0006zp-VE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:31:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gFD-00040B-VL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:31:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gFD-0003zw-N4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:31:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4F58DF9D.9060502@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:34:37 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F582EDB.1040608@redhat.com> <4F58B5CB.8040503@codemonkey.ws> <20120308144958.GA25750@t420s.optimusnet> <4F58C897.5020405@codemonkey.ws> <4F58D441.60106@redhat.com> <20120308155703.GA30606@t420s.optimusnet> <4F58DA08.8080903@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4F58DA08.8080903@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , QEMU devel , Scott Zawalski , Cleber Rosa , "kvm-autotest@redhat.com" , Ademar Reis Am 08.03.2012 17:10, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> And, of course: >> [qemu]$ test-runner --remote=autotest.qemu.org tests.d/block > > I don't understand what this would do. >>From the previous discussions on this topic, I suppose it would task the autotest instance at autotest.qemu.org to run the block tests on my git tree and send me an email with the results, or something like that. For running full tests this would be a great thing to have, I don't want my own development boxes to be busy for several hours. Not sure if it can work for upstream, though. And if you want to translate the syntax, I guess it would be make remote=autotest.qemu.org check-block in your proposal. I'm fine with either syntax. Kevin