From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33923) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gKg-0000KH-Qv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:36:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gKe-0004sP-Sw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:36:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:45306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5gKe-0004sI-Mo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:36:48 -0500 Received: by pbcuo5 with SMTP id uo5so1980497pbc.4 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:36:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F58E01A.20402@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:36:42 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F582EDB.1040608@redhat.com> <4F58B5CB.8040503@codemonkey.ws> <20120308144958.GA25750@t420s.optimusnet> <4F58C897.5020405@codemonkey.ws> <4F58D441.60106@redhat.com> <20120308155703.GA30606@t420s.optimusnet> <4F58DA08.8080903@codemonkey.ws> <4F58DF9D.9060502@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F58DF9D.9060502@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Future goals for autotest and virtualization tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues , QEMU devel , Scott Zawalski , Cleber Rosa , "kvm-autotest@redhat.com" , Ademar Reis On 03/08/2012 10:34 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 08.03.2012 17:10, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> And, of course: >>> [qemu]$ test-runner --remote=autotest.qemu.org tests.d/block >> >> I don't understand what this would do. > > From the previous discussions on this topic, I suppose it would task the > autotest instance at autotest.qemu.org to run the block tests on my git > tree and send me an email with the results, or something like that. For > running full tests this would be a great thing to have, I don't want my > own development boxes to be busy for several hours. Not sure if it can > work for upstream, though. I don't think that's realistic from an upstream PoV. We don't have the infrastructure today to host that and the companies that do have that infrastructure behind their firewall I imagine. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > And if you want to translate the syntax, I guess it would be make > remote=autotest.qemu.org check-block in your proposal. I'm fine with > either syntax. > > Kevin >