From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S72cZ-0007jq-IM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:37:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S72cP-0002zO-U1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:36:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S72cP-0002z6-Lx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:36:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4F5DD1B8.1040901@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:36:40 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1330893156-26569-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1330893156-26569-2-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <4F5485F6.9060109@redhat.com> <4F5AAFC6.9040202@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5AAFC6.9040202@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] kvmclock: Always register type List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws, lcapitulino@redhat.com On 03/10/2012 03:35 AM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 05.03.2012 10:23, schrieb Avi Kivity: > > On 03/04/2012 10:32 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > >> Currently, the "kvmclock" type is only registered when kvm_enabled(). > >> > >> This breaks when moving type registration to before command line > >> parsing (so that QOM types can be used for CPU and machine). > >> > >> Since the QOM classes are lazy-initialized anyway and kvmclock_creat= e() > >> has another kvm_enabled() check, simply drop the KVM check in > >> kvmclock_register_types(). > >> > >> kvm-i8259, kvm-apic and kvm-ioapic do not suffer from such a check. > >=20 > > Patch looks good. > > Ping for series. > > Avi, do you want to sign this patch off through uq/master? Or should I > make the above a Reviewed-by (and remove the Cc:) within this series? > Reviewed-by: please. --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function