From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58911)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1S7AQs-0005u5-Bc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:57:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1S7AQq-0001JD-Mj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:57:21 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:43110)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1S7AQq-0001Ix-Gi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:57:20 -0400
Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so6770082dad.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F5E470A.5040909@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:57:14 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1331557893-30806-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
	<4F5E4628.8050706@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAJ+F1C+_X4_G_TF2g3YCU7iFQZDHH250HNg=wOoQ4_8s78HVGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+F1C+_X4_G_TF2g3YCU7iFQZDHH250HNg=wOoQ4_8s78HVGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH/RFC 0/7] Screendump to UNIX socket & in PNG
 format
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9_Lureau?= <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9_Lureau?= <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>

On 03/12/2012 01:56 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  wrote:
>> Why not just return the screendump through QMP?
>
> in base64, base85?

I think Jan had patches for base64 blobs but I think it got tangled up in 
VMState related controversy.

Jan, am I correct?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori