From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7CeX-0000n5-Hi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:19:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7CeO-00022R-7Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:19:37 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:48796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7CeO-000228-2y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:19:28 -0400 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21so3597870yho.4 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5E685A.4090104@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:19:22 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F5E58BE.6040808@weilnetz.de> <4F5E5CA4.3040407@codemonkey.ws> <4F5E6572.5060604@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!! List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Stefan Weil , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefano Stabellini On 03/12/2012 04:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 12 March 2012 21:06, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> In all fairness, the last build breakage I see was specific to win32, was >> reported on Mar 1st, and a patch was committed on Mar 3rd. > > Commit 02021812452 (patch reported March 2nd, applied March 9th) > is more recent than that. I'll take full blame here. I had thought I applied it and hadn't. But I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > I think a couple of days is fine, a week (with a pile of other > stuff committed beforehand) is less than ideal. > > -- PMM