From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: quintela@redhat.com
Cc: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>,
KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 13
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:22:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5E9352.1010806@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r4wyuh4w.fsf@elfo.elfo>
Am 12.03.2012 13:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
* QEMU 1.1 roadmap
If we're still aiming for a release in early May that would mean a
feature freeze in about four weeks.
http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.1
My stake is that I'd like to see CPUs and machines QOM'ified for 1.1,
and I'm aware that also CPU hot-plug and CPU versioning features depend
on it. Not sure what timeline the respective authors have in mind, but
IMO we should start counting backwards when series need to be finalized
on the list and by whom they should get merged. Easter is on April 8th
this year!
Other features that I have in mind are qtest, qemu-test, gtk-doc and 4th
QOM series. Not sure which of those were meant for 1.1.
With the Wiki closed, having contributors add Feature pages for their
1.1 wishlist, as done for 1.0, is probably not going to work well, but
collecting a rough list or dependency tree would be nice for planning.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-12 12:40 [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 13 Juan Quintela
2012-03-13 0:22 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-03-13 2:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-13 14:05 ` Andreas Färber
2012-03-13 13:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-03-13 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-12 23:16 Juan Quintela
2011-12-12 23:31 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5E9352.1010806@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).