From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52265)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1S7P7a-0007OV-B8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:38:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1S7P7T-0003HV-Nw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:38:25 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52687 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1S7P7T-0003HR-HV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:38:19 -0400
Message-ID: <4F5F2396.3020002@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:38:14 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203121648210.923@kaball-desktop>
	<87wr6pwvas.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es>
In-Reply-To: <87wr6pwvas.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!!
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Llu=EDs_Vilanova?= <vilanova@ac.upc.edu>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

Am 12.03.2012 19:03, schrieb Llu=EDs Vilanova:
> Stefano Stabellini writes:
> [...]
>> Patches are being posted to the list that don't get any reviews at all=
.
>> Other patches get reviewed the first time, then once they are reposted
>> they don't get any other reviews or acked-by or reviewed-by.
>=20
> What are the different tags available and what is their semantic? Maybe=
 this
> should be written down somewhere (HACKING?).
>=20
> I'll contribute a starting list of tags
> (http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches), p=
lease
> check these are the desired semantics for this project.
>=20
> * Cc: Full Name <email>
>=20
>   In addition to sending the patches to the mailing list, they must be =
Cc'ed to,
>   at least, the maintainers for the affected files. You can look up the
>   maintainers for each file in the MAINTAINERS file.
>=20
>   The command "git send-email" will automatically look for such a tag i=
n order
>   to send a CC of the mail to the given person.
>=20
>   Document maintainer discovery with 'scripts/get_maintainer.pl'?

Add this to your .git/config:

[sendemail]
	cccmd =3D scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit-fallback

The poorly documented argument avoids fallback to git-blame.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg