From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7Sx6-0008Pc-FM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:44:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7Swy-0002xX-38 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:43:52 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:38845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7Swx-0002xI-Tr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:43:44 -0400 Received: by ggnj2 with SMTP id j2so704144ggn.4 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5F5D1A.1050307@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:43:38 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F5E58BE.6040808@weilnetz.de> <4F5E5C49.6060900@codemonkey.ws> <4F5E66A8.5050308@weilnetz.de> <4F5E6809.1000405@codemonkey.ws> <4F5E8774.2010003@suse.de> <4F5E91CA.7040104@codemonkey.ws> <4F5F50BF.2020107@redhat.com> <4F5F5C0F.6010502@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5F5C0F.6010502@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!! List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Peter Maydell , Stefano Stabellini , Stefan Weil , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= On 03/13/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/13/2012 04:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> (plus it puts an extra person in the loop which is pretty >>>> much guaranteed to slow things down). >>> >>> Having the committers process all these patches (and monitor all >>> patches) is guaranteed to slow things down too. >> >> They're in the loop anyway, because they have to process the pull >> request just as they would a single patch. > > Anthony's shunting emails with [PULL] into a special queue, so yes > they're in the loop, but it's a smaller one. Right, if we want urgency on something, there has to be a filterable keyword. I don't read every single message on qemu-devel every hour of the day. The advantage of [PULL] over [urgent] is that it fits the existing workflows. It's clear who should be doing [PULL] requests. Regards, Anthony Liguori >