From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Xtensa misuse of tb_invalidate_phys_page_range()?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:08:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F673DEE.3040508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMo8BfK9kYuiDohiUwzLAyNGQrCtYnA_Yg5mpOpfrL1Y-AEhkg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/19/2012 03:51 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> > void HELPER(wsr_ibreaka)(uint32_t i, uint32_t v)
> > {
> > if (env->sregs[IBREAKENABLE] & (1 << i) && env->sregs[IBREAKA + i]
> > != v) {
> > tb_invalidate_phys_page_range(
> > env->sregs[IBREAKA + i], env->sregs[IBREAKA + i] + 1, 0);
> > tb_invalidate_phys_page_range(v, v + 1, 0);
> > }
> > env->sregs[IBREAKA + i] = v;
> > }
> >
> > tb_invalidate_phys_page_range() expects a virtual address in user mode,
> > and a ram_addr_t in system mode. I'm guessing that v is a virtual address?
>
> Yes, it's a virtual address here, as well as in wsr_lbeg/wsr_lend helpers.
> I made a test for it and it actually fails. I wonder how could it stay unnoticed
> that long :()
There are many silent breakages like that, don't worry.
> > This needs to be fixed for system mode if so (and in any case - even if
> > it's a physical address, it needs to be translated to a ram_addr_t).
>
> Sure. Will try to fix it, though it's completely unclear to me now
> how to do it efficiently.
Since I'm rewriting this area, don't worry about efficiency. Let's get
it correct and after the rewrite we can reexamine efficiency.
I imagine you'll need something like breakpoint_invalidate().
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 11:58 [Qemu-devel] Xtensa misuse of tb_invalidate_phys_page_range()? Avi Kivity
2012-03-19 13:51 ` Max Filippov
2012-03-19 14:08 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-03-25 2:00 ` Max Filippov
2012-03-25 2:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] target-xtensa: fix tb invalidation for IBREAK and LOOP Max Filippov
2012-03-25 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] Xtensa misuse of tb_invalidate_phys_page_range()? Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F673DEE.3040508@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).