From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9fzm-00041r-GU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:04:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9fzg-0007i7-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:03:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34987) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9fzg-0007hx-0x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:03:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6766E5.1030404@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:03:33 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1332169763-30665-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4F675A55.5080000@redhat.com> <4F675F63.7070305@codemonkey.ws> <4F675FEE.7020605@redhat.com> <4F6761CE.1090605@codemonkey.ws> <4F6762B3.6060807@redhat.com> <4F676482.9070302@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4F676482.9070302@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , Eric Blake , Gerd Hoffman , Eduardo Habkost Il 19/03/2012 17:53, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >> >> Yeah,it depends on what you consider good. :) My direction was like >> "let's cover 90% of the usecases with a decent syntax"; yours is "let's >> cover 100% of the usecases even though the syntax may stink". >> >> (There's time to convert -display before 1.1, which would make 99%). > > So if we had 99% with good syntax and 1% with a syntax that stinks, that > seems reasonable to me, no? Yeah, I suppose so. :) Paolo