From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9xwK-0005a9-E3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:13:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9xwE-0002cJ-0c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:13:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9xwD-0002bh-Ov for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:13:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4F687457.5010405@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:13:11 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1332242812-6993-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spice: fix 32bit build List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > What's the roms/seabios change doing here? Just a missing "git submodule update" and the diff from that sneaking in. > Also, isn't the ui/spice-display.c patch the same as this one from > me from a couple of weeks back? > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/145269/ It is. Picked that one up instead. /me is confused, I through I had that one already and we just got new warnings, sorry. cheers, Gerd