From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SA33t-0007wP-4V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:41:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SA33n-000498-0Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:41:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SA33m-00048s-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:41:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4F68C13F.4090203@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:41:19 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/7] RTC: Set internal millisecond register to 500ms when reset divider List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "Zhang, Yang Z" , "aliguori@us.ibm.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Il 20/03/2012 18:39, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto: > This code is new: does it mean we were not handling divider reset > correctly before? > Also if we are trying to handle the DV registers, shouldn't we emulated > the other RTC frequencies as well? If so, we need a scale factor, in > addition to an offset to QEMU rtc_clock. The other frequencies are never used in practice. But divider reset's 500ms delay can be used in tests. Paolo