From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SALuj-0006SH-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:49:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SALud-0000fo-9O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:49:21 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:17386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SALuc-0000fd-Vj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:49:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4F69DC55.3030102@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:49:09 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F69CB66.8080903@siemens.com> <4F69D946.3040800@redhat.com> <4F69DA23.8070108@siemens.com> <20120321134157.GT22368@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120321134157.GT22368@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH uq/master] kvm: Drop unused kvm_pit_in_kernel List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Avi Kivity , kvm , qemu-devel On 2012-03-21 14:41, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:39:47PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-03-21 14:36, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> On 03/21/2012 02:36 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> This is now implied by kvm_irqchip_in_kernel. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> So we can't have -no-kvm-pit? >>> >>> No huge loss, but unexpected. >> >> See e81dda195556e72f8cd294998296c1051aab30a8. >> > I am curious what is the reason for upstream to not supporting disabling the > in-kernel PIT separately? It was considered no longer relevant: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/85393 Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux