From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAOQ4-0001bS-6K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:29:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAOPx-0003W4-Bs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:29:51 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39487 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAOPx-0003Vb-1E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:29:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6A01F6.7000307@suse.de> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:29:42 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 24/36] vmstate: port arm cpu List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela: > Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to > bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced. >=20 > Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can "use" > uncached_cpsr for saving state. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela As stated previously, I still think we should hold off converting the ARM CPU to VMState until the cp15 rework by Peter takes on shape. On another matter, had you prefixed this patch with "target-arm: " rather than hiding that essential keyword where my mailer cuts it off, it would be much easier to find in this series than amidst lots of "vmstate: " patches. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg