From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAW72-0000OB-Dw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:42:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAW6z-0003IF-CC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:42:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAW6z-0003Hr-4l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:42:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6A757B.4020503@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:42:35 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F68759E.10805@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] RTC: New logic to emulate RTC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: "aliguori@us.ibm.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Il 22/03/2012 01:23, Zhang, Yang Z ha scritto: > Actually, I also see some failures during testing. And most of them > are fail to pass the 244us update cycle checking. Since we are in > emulation environment, we cannot ensure it always greater than 244us. > So I think it should not be a bug. Yes, that's fine. But I also see some cases in which the first upgrade cycle after divider reset is not reported. The second, 1.5 seconds after divider reset, is fine. Paolo