From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCcsL-0006ql-G0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:20:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCcsJ-0000b7-JF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:20:17 -0400 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:55391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCcsJ-0000b3-Dg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:20:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7220F9.10305@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:20:09 -0500 From: Meador Inge MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1329762416-6012-1-git-send-email-meadori@codesourcery.com> <4F42A124.8080406@suse.de> <4F71D7D3.1040901@codesourcery.com> <20120327171554.GA16571@afflict.kos.to> In-Reply-To: <20120327171554.GA16571@afflict.kos.to> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] syscall: #ifdef newer RLIMIT_* codes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Riku Voipio Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= On 03/27/2012 12:15 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > Do we really need this? 2.6.12 came out in 2005, even oldest supported > RHEL (5) is minimum 2.6.18 these days. The development environment I am working with uses a RHEL 3 compatible sysroot (RHEL 3 is currently marked with "extended life cycle support"). So, I definitely need it :-) (and yes I know that this sysroot is ancient). I don't know if others are using such old development sysroots. The changes are minimal and while it would be great to have this applied upstream I do understand if you want to NACK. -- Meador Inge CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded http://www.mentor.com/embedded-software