From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCypg-00079Y-Fe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:47:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCypd-0003RV-Lv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:46:59 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:53586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCypd-0003R7-Bq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:46:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4F736AAD.3090107@web.de> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:46:53 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1332606390-3605-1-git-send-email-lee.essen@nowonline.co.uk> <20120327072344.GB18074@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> <4F71A525.1080406@web.de> <4F71AC08.2000600@nowonline.co.uk> <4F71C6F4.4000700@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add socket/xnet libs to configure for Solaris List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Lee Essen , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 27.03.2012 19:24, schrieb Blue Swirl: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:56, Andreas Färber wrote: >> [...] While the MAINTAINER host support >> sections do not list me (they're still new in there), Solaris patches >> have traditionally gone through me, so that is not a particular reaction >> to the contents of form of Lee's patches, I am serious. > > I'm a bit surprised about this claim, I think I haven't been aware of > this route. When did Solaris patches go through you, could you name > some? Just stumbled over this branch with e88131d2177cf12dba99c13fe5ff6a21d8fb7dc1 from Sep 19, 2010 at its head: http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/solaris Guess whom it was committed by? http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/commit/e78815a554adaa551d62a71be10ee2fcf128e473 As you can see, the more recent C99 patch - which Avi offered to write in response to my(!) report - is not in there, since this branch is still from my old OpenSolaris machine that I screwed up during an attempted migration to OpenIndiana. But like I said elsewhere, further patches are not strictly needed when building without guest agent and tracing and running in a bash environment, thus no need for tons of patches for a working platform. So had you wanted to, it would've been really easy to find evidence that I was the last one around here working on Solaris/illumos support. Andreas