From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEGZP-0001kH-6A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:55:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEGZN-0006b9-F3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:55:30 -0400 Received: from speedy.comstyle.com ([206.51.28.2]:15905 helo=mail.comstyle.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEGZN-0006b3-AD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:55:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7817FB.8040702@comstyle.com> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:55:23 -0400 From: Brad Smith MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120401024817.GA14275@rox.home.comstyle.com> <4F7813AB.5000802@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4F7813AB.5000802@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] More build breakage: signrom.sh vs kvmvapic.bin List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/04/12 4:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > It is only build on x86 unix hosts minus Mac. We are shipping it as > binary for the rest. There is WIP on getting KVM working for Solaris, so > this may not be of Linux-only interest in the future. Ok so you then build it on Linux and Solaris. But I don't see the point of building it on any OS that does not have KVM since you'll never use it there. > signrom.sh is horribly slow and should be replaced soon, see > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/139368 I don't care if it's slow. The build is broken. That is what matters. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.