From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57933) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEnaP-0007ce-Ad for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:10:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEnaN-0005OG-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:10:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:54051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEnaN-0005OA-79 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:10:43 -0400 Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so4948164obb.4 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F7A07BF.8000800@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:10:39 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F79FF0E.9090701@web.de> <4F7A0105.8030707@codemonkey.ws> <4F7A06FF.5090201@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4F7A06FF.5090201@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev property listing broken List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel On 04/02/2012 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-04-02 21:41, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Is there a reason you're using info qtree instead of qom-list? qom-list >> gives you much more info than info qtree. > > BTW, the qom-list output is still, well, sparsely populated. Also, there > is a "-r" (for recursive) switch missing to make it similar useful one > day. And we will likely need a few pretty-printing controls. Yes, I'd like to move this all into the monitor too FWIW for 1.2. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Jan >