From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF08T-0000jF-IX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:34:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF08O-0001Bi-95 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:34:45 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34618 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF08O-00019a-2i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:34:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7AC42E.4040406@suse.de> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:34:38 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Memory: unify ioport registration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Julien Grall , avi@redhat.com Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, julian.pidancet@citrix.com Am 02.04.2012 16:37, schrieb Julien Grall: > Replace register_ioport* by portio_list_*. [snip] Are these changes guaranteed to not change the addresses in some way? We've had really subtle bugs with offsets added / not added in the past. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg