From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF0iN-0001cp-E5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:11:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF0iI-00027o-Ts for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:11:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SF0iI-00027L-L7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:11:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7ACCDC.7010800@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:11:40 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F7AC42E.4040406@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4F7AC42E.4040406@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Memory: unify ioport registration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Julien Grall , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, julian.pidancet@citrix.com On 04/03/2012 12:34 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 02.04.2012 16:37, schrieb Julien Grall: > > Replace register_ioport* by portio_list_*. > [snip] > > Are these changes guaranteed to not change the addresses in some way? Yes (modulo those subtle bugs). > We've had really subtle bugs with offsets added / not added in the past. Those were bugs in the implementation of the portio functions and the memory core, not the conversions IIRC. --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function