From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFTEs-0001Bo-Ha for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:39:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFTEl-0005zM-VA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:39:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFTEl-0005yh-Nl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:39:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7C7928.1070404@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:39:04 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F7C663E.20200@redhat.com> <4F7C67BA.4000007@siemens.com> <4F7C68E2.508@redhat.com> <4F7C715E.506@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4F7C715E.506@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Spread the use of QEMU threading & locking API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Kevin Wolf , Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Il 04/04/2012 18:05, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: >> > Perhaps you can take the relevant patches out of the thread-blocks >> > branch at git://github.com/pbonzini/qemu.git? The iothread eventfd >> > could also use an EventNotifier. > Yep, this screams for something like QemuEvent which pleases all users > of current qemu_eventfd and EventNotifier - and fit into the existing > threading/synchronization abstraction layout. Kind of, on Unix you cannot poll synchronization primitives so EventNotifier has to remain separate from qemu-thread. > I retract patches 3&4, will be done on top of the event rework. Cool, thanks! Paolo