From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFlvi-00030V-4r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:36:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFlvX-0007th-HJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:36:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFlvX-0007sx-8i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:36:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7D91CD.4080608@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:36:29 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1333451753-3550-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1333451753-3550-24-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4F7AE8F5.50508@suse.de> <4F7AF527.5020404@redhat.com> <4F7D8A40.7040504@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4F7D8A40.7040504@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/25] qom: add realized property List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori Il 05/04/2012 14:04, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: > Am 03.04.2012 15:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 03/04/2012 14:11, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: >>> Since this patch is clearly an extended version of my realize patch >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/148752/, it should carry my SoB, as >>> reminded last night. If you don't want my SoB on the parts I didn't d= o - >>> namely unrealize and *_childen - then feel free to split the patch in >>> two. Simply dropping attribution in both cover letter and commit just >>> because I didn't get around yet to sending a v2 with those requests >>> addressed is not nice! >> >> Technically it's not, because I redid it from scratch (I never even ha= d >> time to really look at your patches beyond reading the commit message, >> and I did this part while I didn't even have network access). >=20 > That's just as lame an accuse (Did you mean excuse?) It's a fact, not an excuse. Do I need to show the two patches side-by-side? That would be even more ridiculous. But I can very well add a SoB on v2. > as Fabrice's when he "redid" a patch of rth back in CVS days. Wasn't there, sorry. > You were around on IRC on March 23rd when I > offered to aliguori to put together a patch for realize (which I am > using in my qom-cpu-sh4 series). Well, I'm always around, that doesn't mean I always have time to read it. > I was fair to cc you and Anthony on it, to avoid clashes between those > of us working on QOM, you commented on my series, so you have read part > of it; yet you announce the day before your series that you are going t= o > send realize and ignore my request to not forget my SoB if you do. > That makes me think that you're deliberately trying to keep my code=20 > contribution out of the picture there, whereas Anthony has stated in > the context of unicore32 that rewriting someone's contribution to get > that person's authorship out of the way were not acceptable. You're assuming I read your patches, which is not the case beyond seeing that the realize didn't propagate. There's really nothing deliberate, and it's quite surprising to me to hear tones escalating so quickly. Paolo