From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42354)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1SPDWU-0005H3-VL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:53:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1SPDWS-0007Tn-Tx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:53:46 -0400
Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:38058)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1SPDWS-0007TT-Pj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:53:44 -0400
Received: by yenr5 with SMTP id r5so2951260yen.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 06:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F9FEAE2.9040205@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 08:53:38 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4F9D797E.500@ilande.co.uk> <4F9D97F3.8080608@codemonkey.ws>
	<4F9E5028.7010306@redhat.com> <4F9E82C7.10706@ilande.co.uk>
	<4F9E9268.70408@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_sKtzmHpFcdhkANLCY0=FuW0Hbof0ifp3uHM66NkWoOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F9E9906.8060401@ilande.co.uk>
	<CAAu8pHs2cAqoWg9z4PSceXEmqbwA340=wa4WRFdkBW1n=VVerA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHs2cAqoWg9z4PSceXEmqbwA340=wa4WRFdkBW1n=VVerA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory API: handling unassigned physical memory
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 05/01/2012 01:57 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 13:52, Mark Cave-Ayland
> <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>  wrote:
>> On 30/04/12 14:27, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>
>>>> IMO the best fix is to unsysbus the device and qomify it instead.  This
>>>> way we're 100% flexible in how we can attach it.
>>>
>>>
>>> You don't need to wait for QOM to grow enough features to
>>> replace sysbus. If you don't like what sysbus_mmio_map() does, you
>>
>>
>> Oh - so does this mean that QOM is not feature-complete?
>
> At least 'Pin' class to replace GPIOs and IRQs is not in HEAD (but
> Anthony already has a tree somewhere) and I can't remember what was
> the plan for buses.

I'm planning on pushing bus support in before I freeze 1.1.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori