From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSNph-0003oP-Oo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 03:30:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSNpa-0005Lo-Rr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 03:30:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:59580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SSNpa-0005LR-Iv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 03:30:34 -0400 Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so2085155pbb.4 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4FAB6E93.5050009@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:30:27 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FAAA13E.10308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <4FAAA13E.10308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] default qemu64 &Co CPUs makes no sense? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-devel , Julien Cristau Il 09/05/2012 18:54, Michael Tokarev ha scritto: > And in case kvm is enabled, and we run on some other CPU > (not intel and not amd), we'll have some other CPU model, > which might exist or might not, which may make some sense > or may not, etc - we simple don't know. Leaving aside the discussions on TCG, yes, this makes no sense for kvm. You should use kvm32 and kvm64 instead. Paolo